somebody wrote:
> Still cuts down on bandwidth, since popular content = high bandwidth usage.
> Why should strict www users subsidize p2p traffic?

It's not about bandwidth. And, truly, popular web sites take *less* 
bandwidth than unpopular ones. That's what proxy servers are for.

> There may be any number of reasons for ISPs to fine tune their services, or
> not to. My point is, they should be *able* to do that, if they chose to do
> so. 

But you don't have any good reason for saying that, right?

I don't mind the ISP deciding what I can see and what I can't, as long as 
the ISP is *also* responsible for what they decide to deliver. If they're 
going to filter legal content, they should be responsible for not filtering 
illegal content.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!

Post a reply to this message